Nichols 1Zach NicholsGordonEnglish 10102 October 2016“Shooting an Elephant” Explanatory EssayIn the essay “Shooting an Elephant” George Or!ell presents a co"plex attit#de to!ard his s#rro#ndings and predica"ents$ %hro#gho#t the essay Or!ell #ses speci&ic diction to display this attit#de that the narrator has$ %his attit#de is con'eyed in the &or" o& the narrator(s tone$ %hro#gho#t the essay the narrator has a 'ery #nco"&ortable tone$ )ro" the 'ery beginning o& the essay diction s#ch as “hated” is #sed instantly beginning to set the tone o& the essay$ %he diction thro#gho#t contin#es to #se !ords !ith strong negati'e connotations$ %his contrib#tes to the negati'e tone that is carried thro#gho#t$ %his essay is &#ll o& speci&ic diction that allo!s the reader to easily deter"ine the tone o& the narrator$%he narrator o& “Shooting an Elephant” begins to set the tone in the 'ery &irst sentence o& the essay$ *e starts !ith “In +o#l"ein in ,o!er -#r"a I !as hated by large n#"bers o& people..the only ti"e in "y li&e that I ha'e been i"portant eno#gh &or this to happen to "e$” -y starting o#t !ith diction li/e “hated” he begins to de'elop a negati'e connotation in this essay$ *ated is rarely 'ie!ed in a positi'e light and al"ost al!ays has a negati'e connotation to it$ %his&irst sentence starts the reader do!n a path o& a negati'e and so"e!hat #nco"&ortable attit#de$ hile the narrator creates a negati'e attit#de he "a/es it "ore co"plex as yo# contin#e thro#gh his essay$ *e states that his s#rro#ndings and sit#ation in ,o!er -#r"a is “perplexing and #psetting” b#t as he goes on he begins to ai" his negati'e attit#de to!ard the -ritish$ *e
In George Orwell’s short narrative. “Shooting an Elephant. ” the storyteller. a immature European sub-divisional constabularies officer provinces. “that when the white adult male turns tyrant it is his ain freedom that he destroys. ” This realisation of British imperialism comes to him one twenty-four hours when he is pressured into hiting and killing a “peacefully eating. ” elephant. Orwell’s tone in this narrative is instead blunt and blunt. The storyteller is frequently talking on how he doesn’t like the society he’s in. It seems like he’s angry yet uncertain about how he truly feels in his community. The struggle here is that the white adult male that is supposed to be in charge realizes that he lives his life to affect the indigens. which reasonably much puts them in charge. As the reader analyzes this narrative. they will shortly understand why the storyteller says he doesn’t like imperialism. However. non because he is for the Burmese. but because he understands what imperialism truly is.
For the reader to calculate out how Orwell uses the tone of his narrative to appeal to the reader. its of import to analyze how early on in the essay Orwell establishes a candid and blunt tone towards the Burmans. Natives. and the British based on imperialism. This is of import to the reader because later on in the narrative he/she will get down to detect the contradiction of the statements being made. The storyteller states how he doesn’t like imperialism and that he’s “all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors. ” Yet. when he foremost describes them. his description of them is instead negative. The storyteller describes the manner the Burmans “got severely on my ( his ) nervousnesss. ” From the leap he seems to be portraying the Burmans as “little animals who tried to do my ( his ) occupation impossible. ”
The clearest illustration of the storytellers attitude towards them is when he writes. “I thought that the greatest joy in the universe would be to drive an bayonet into a Buddhist priest’s backbones. ” The storytellers attitude towards the Burmans is of import because he is seeking to demo readers that he merely truly dislikes imperialism because he lives his unrecorded to affect them. In “Shooting an Elephant. ” Orwell appears to be utilizing the manner he describes the rabble of Burmans to demo the reader that the Burmans have a immense impact on society merely because the white adult male is ever seeking to affect them.
Once the reader begins to understand how Orwell is utilizing a blunt and blunt tone towards the Burmans and imperialism. so one can get down to understand how he uses a conflicted portraiture of imperialism to foreground his ethical struggles. To do his point about the issues with dictatorship and subjugation. he routinely calls attending to his disfavor of the imperium he served. If there is one transition that epitomizes his issue with dictatorship is when he explains. “when the white adult male turns tyrant it his his ain freedom that he destroys. ” Bespeaking that when the British became “in control. ” they truly became “under control. ” He besides states that the lone ground they were in charge is because they had arms that the Natives and Burmans didn’t have. The gun was “the futility of the white man’s rule in the East. ” While. “The Burmese population had no arms and were rather incapacitated against it. ” Orwell’s conflicted attitude toward the storytellers attitude towards the society he lives in this transition appears to be another illustration of Orwell seeking to demo readers that he merely does what he does because it’s what “the indigens expect of him. ”
One can acquire a sense of Orwell’s conflicted attitude toward imperialism when he goes on to state the reader that he doesn’t want to look like a sap. The most revealing line is when Orwell writes. “And my whole life. every white man’s life in the East. was one long battle non to be laughed at. ” Orwell seems to be naming the readers attending to the fact that he merely merely killed the elephant to “avoid looking like a sap. ” One begins to see a clear form to how Orwell s utilizing commentary to name the readers attending to his dry and unsure position. While Orwell may be utilizing uncertainness throughout the essay to demo the reader the moral complexness of his state of affairs. another important illustration of Orwell’s entreaty to the reader is the blunt tone he uses to portray the dead cooly. Orwell is explicating how the elephant was destructing places and killed a native. one might detect how Orwell makes particular note of upseting imagination.
Although it may be elusive. one can see a definite sense of Orwell’s attitude here when he writes. “He was lying on his abdomen with his weaponries crucified and caput unfastened. the dentition bared and grinning with an look of intolerable torment. ” When depicting the dead cooly he besides says that he looks “devilish. ” The storytellers attitude toward the cooly in this transition appears to be an illustration of Orwell seeking to demo the readers how we wouldn’t experience bad. Since Orwell uses words like “devilish” and “unendurable agony” the reader would acquire more of a sense of disgust. Alternatively of the reader feeling bad for the dead cooly. the reader merely thinks its disgusting. The reader doesn’t think “aww hapless guiltless adult male. ” That’s precisely what Orwell wanted when he wrote.
Similarly. one can besides acquire a sense of Orwell’s sympathetic attitude towards the elephant when he goes to state the reader that the elephant was “peacefully eating. ” Orwell writes. “But I did non desire to hit the elephant. I watched him crushing his clump of grass against his articulatio genuss. whit the bemused grandmotherly air. . ” In this instance. Orwell is doing it look as if the elephant has done nil incorrect. And he already describes the elephant better than he described the Burmans and Natives. While he has called the inexperienced person Burmans “little animals. ” he compares the elephant that has killed a native and destroyed places as being “grandmotherly. ” Which is really dry since the Burmans and Natives are the 1 that hasn’t done any injury. At this point the reader is worried more for the elephant than he/she was the dead cooly and the Burmans.
When the storyteller has a crowd of eager indigens behind him. all ready for him to kill the elephant. the reader is inquiring what is approximately to go on. Once the storyteller does hit the elephant. Orwell’s tone becomes really sympathetic towards the elephant. In this instance. the reader can see that Orwell’s attitude can be illustrated more when he writes. “You could see the torment of it ( the slug ) jolt his whole organic structure and strike hard the last leftover of strength from his legs. ” He continues by composing. “Finally. I fired my two staying shootings into the topographic point where I thought his bosom must be. ” With the portraiture of the elephant here. Orwell seems to be underlining to the reader that people will experience more sympathetic towards the elephant than the human simple because he used a more sympathetic tone when depicting the elephant. This is precisely what Orwell wants the reader to experience. One can detect how Orwell is systematically disputing the reader to sympathize with the moral issues that he is narrating throughout the essay by coercing the reader to face the fact that the elephant was incorrect and we should truly be more sympathetic towards the cooly because he’s homo and was guiltless. unlike the elephant.
In George Orwell’s narrative “Shooting an Elephant. ” he writes. “a narrative ever sounds clear plenty at a distance. but the nearer you get to the scene of events the vaguer it becomes. ” In this instance he is depicting his ain narrative. At first you would believe that the storyteller feels bad for the Burmese and Natives and he truly doesn’t like imperialism. But when you look deeper into the narrative the reader realizes that the lone ground that he doesn’t like imperialism is because he realizes that he lives to affect others.
Orwell. George. “Shooting an Elephant. ” Shooting an Elephant and Other Essays. New York: Penguin Group Inc. . 2003. Blackboard. PDF file.
Need Essay Sample?
We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $12.90/page